Staffing brief
Reviewed role details, must-have requirements, process notes and the remaining items to confirm before candidate submission.
Talent and capability discoveryTalent Forge
People. Potential. Progress.
Connect staffing briefs, source-linked candidate review and accountable interview decisions.
FIND / Talent Forge
Candidate review
Turn a broad claim into a question worth asking.
A role request and a candidate profile rarely arrive in the same language. Talent Forge helps reviewers connect the requirement to supplied material, identify what needs clarification and prepare a focused interview. The assessment record preserves the human judgment behind the candidate's next step.
From a claim to a useful questionExample
Role briefSource reviewInterview
Supplied material
“Delivery experience”
Illustrative source excerptMention found ≠ skill verifiedInterview promptsWhat did you personally deliver?
Ask about decisions, contribution and inspectable work.
Role brief
Resolve the request before evaluating the person.
The request reader proposes role, seniority, location, timing and requirement fields from supplied text. Source locations make it possible to resolve conflicting details before the recruiter carries the brief forward.
- Missing and conflicting fields become explicit items to confirm.
- Must-have requirements and process notes retain their source context.
- Permission to share candidate material and private readiness checks stay part of the submission discussion.
Interactive example
Turn a claim into an interview.
Choose the supplied material and review standing to develop a focused question about personal contribution.
Synthetic inputsComputed in this browser
Talent ForgeInteractive workspace
Choose a starting pointThen change any input to explore the difference.
01 / Set the context
Authored role and profile · senior engineering review
The example brief needs a clear statement of the work being reviewed.
All excerpts are authored examples, with no candidate data.
Independent ratings precede the shared panel discussion.
Authored examples for exploring the workflow. Your choices update only this demonstration.
02 / Inspect the basisInterview preparation record
2 evidence items to resolve
1 of 3 example checks met. Follow the evidence questions before carrying the example forward.
1 / 3 checks met
Review checks1 / 3 met
Role requirementMet
The role brief explicitly requires ownership of production incident decisions and follow-up.Supplied profile evidenceReview
Example excerpt: “Worked on incident response.” It names the activity without personal contribution or an inspectable artifact.Panel inputReview
The example interviewer has yet to record an independent rating and notes.
Next review step
Ask: Which incident decision did you personally make, what tradeoff did you consider, and what work can we inspect?
Inspect the selected evidence
- Role requirement
- The role brief explicitly requires ownership of production incident decisions and follow-up.
- Supplied profile evidence
- Example excerpt: “Worked on incident response.” It names the activity without personal contribution or an inspectable artifact.
- Panel input
- The example interviewer has yet to record an independent rating and notes.
Illustrative review record · human decisions and subsequent actions keep their own standing.
The product
Find the right people.
Talent Forge helps recruiting and technical teams prepare a candidate review from explicit role requirements. Supplied profile material stays connected to its source, gaps become interview questions, and human assessments retain their notes and rationale in a protected workspace.
Enterprise AI journeyFIND
Inside Talent Forge
Make the evidence behind a candidate review visible.
Connect a staffing request to the source material, questions and interview decisions behind candidate review. Recruiters and technical reviewers can work from explicit role requirements while keeping missing evidence and the next question in view.
- Recruiting teams
- Talent operations
- Technical interviewers
How the work moves
Prepare the role briefReviewed staffing brief
Read a staffing request into proposed role, seniority, location, timing and requirement fields. Resolve missing or conflicting details against the source before preparing the brief.
Inspect the supplied materialSource-linked document review
Compare role requirements with supplied profile text and technical excerpts. See exact phrase locations and keep absent source material visible for follow-up.
Prepare the interviewFocused interview questions
Turn uncertain claims into questions about work personally delivered, technical decisions and examples a reviewer can inspect. Keep each prompt connected to the requirement it addresses.
Record the human assessmentInterview and decision record
Capture interviewer ratings, notes and the reason for a disposition in the protected workspace. Keep recorded panel feedback and the decision available together.
What the work produces.
Document review brief
Supplied text excerpts with source locations, requirement mentions and interview prompts for a reviewer to pursue.
Interview record
Recorded ratings, reviewer notes, the disposition and its rationale, retained within the authorized candidate workspace.
A phrase in a profile is a starting point for assessment. Skills, identity, availability and permission to submit a candidate each require their own confirmation.
In practice · illustrative scenario
Clarify ownership behind a strong technical profile.
A recruiter is reviewing a candidate for a senior engineering role. The profile names relevant technologies, but the supplied excerpts do not yet establish which production decisions the candidate personally owned.
- 01
Anchor the requirement
Confirm the role's required work and compare it with the supplied profile and technical material.
- 02
Prepare a focused question
Ask the candidate to explain a decision they made, the work they delivered and the evidence a technical reviewer can examine.
- 03
Record the assessment
Interviewers record their own ratings and notes before the panel reviews differences and retains a reasoned disposition.
The useful outcome
The illustrative output is a focused interview and assessment record, with the candidate's claims, supporting material and remaining questions available together.
A closer look
Know what you can do with Talent Forge.
Does a profile mention establish a skill?
It establishes that the supplied material contains the claim. Reviewers use relevant excerpts, interview answers and inspectable work to assess capability and personal contribution. The next question should address the evidence the requirement actually needs.
Can we bring material from our recruiting systems?
Start with the supplied role and candidate material and agree the permitted intake or integration path for your workspace. Source access, consent and submission authority are established for that path; the illustrative review workbench uses authored examples.
What stays with the interview decision?
The recorded ratings, reviewer notes and reason for the disposition in the authorized workspace. Blind-first assessment supports independent input before panel discussion, and the record makes the feedback behind the decision available for later review.
